Silence Is A Sign Of Death
Saturday:
Eighth week of the Year May 28,
2016
Mark 11:27-33. Year I: Sirach 51:12-20; Psalm 19:8-11; Year II: Jude 17:20-25; Psalm 63:2-6.
This
reading teaches us a very important lesson: Jesus cannot deal with people who
refuse to enter into dialogue.
The
“chief priests, scribes and elders” ask Jesus a legitimate question. He has
just thrown out the merchants they allowed in the temple. They demand, “By what
authority are you doing this?”
Jesus
knows they are closed to the answer, so he tries to help them get in touch with
their own hearts: “Was John’s baptism of divine origin, or was it merely human?
Answer my question, and I will answer yours.”
They
got in touch with their hearts, and fast. They realized, “If we say ‘divine,’
he will ask, ‘Then why did you not put faith in it?” But they knew that if they
said, “Merely human,” the crowd might turn on them, because the people “all
regarded John as a true prophet.” So they took the coward’s way, and knew with
crystal clarity they were doing it: They answered, “We do not know.”
Jesus
made them face the fact that they were insincere. In thinking how to answer him
they didn’t ask what was true, or even what they themselves deeply thought was
true. They were not looking for truth and never had been, even when listening
to John. All they were trying to do was defend their position — their power,
their prestige, the status quo of doctrine that called nothing of theirs into
question. So they refused to discuss the issue.
And
in response, so did Jesus. He said to them, “Neither will I tell you by what
authority I am doing these things.”
Every
teacher and preacher in the Church who openly asks what authentic Catholic
doctrine is meets the same opposition. Sometimes it is from authorities blindly
defending the status quo. Sometimes from the perennial “Pharisee party” who
cling to the simple and static religion of uncontextualized rules and
unexamined catechism answers. If asked whether a rule, observed to the letter
under particular circumstances, will “do good or evil” (3:4), they refuse to
answer. They are not interested in the intention of the lawgiver or the mind of
the Church. Nor do they want to know the source or limits or direction of the
Church’s current teaching. Stagnancy serves their purpose and they cling to it.
Even Jesus cannot talk to them.
The
Good News is that eventually Jesus wins. At first the prophets are stoned. But
eventually the “pilgrim Church” catches up with them.
Initiative: Give God’s
life: Distinguish between
the teaching of the Church and
teaching in the Church.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave your comments!